We have only quoted Constitutional 1901 LAW, as all other people's quote, when they are in the Courts of their countries. I have never "taken the law into my own hands" at any time, as these documents relay:
We have been to every Court in Australia, and have been denied the Constitutional 1901 rights, that are the ONLY LAW to be obeyed in Australia, pursuant to Clause 5 of the Preamble of the said Constitution 1901, as well as S 128 National Referendums.
The High Court, in Vorhauer v The Queen and other Transcripts (2003), refused a S. 40 Application to apply for Commonwealth Law only for my trial, which meant Local Council "orders" had to be obeyed, under Land and Environment Court Orders.
As can be seen in these documents, we have been to some of the Courts in Australia, and cannot get justice. This is why we are going to try the World Court of Justice. Are you in the same situation? Are you interested in joining us? There are no solicitors involved. There are no fees of money that have to be paid to go to the World Court.
You have to read the Law for yourself. Justice is IMPOSSIBLE, when you don't know the Constitution of your own country.
No comments:
Post a Comment
The Application to the Governor-General enclosed to prorogue the state parliaments and their local councils pursuant to s.109 Constitution 1901 is because the High Courts Metwally (1984) ORDERED in 1984, that S.109 CACA 1901, has always destroyed state parliament law since 1901 by S. 109 and 70 of the Constitution 1901, and Constitutional 1901 High Court compliant orders must be obeyed. Solicitors wont tell you, they are making money out of this system of treasonous cruelty. The High Court cannot prorogue the state parliaments. The Governor General, and the Queen do though. One person will be ignored. But the voices of many won't be. Clause 5 Preamble demands obedience by The Queen and the Governor General as well as us.
Leave a comment and contact details if your interested.